The Jeju Forum for Peace and Prosperity

FORUM

HOME
FORUM

The 6th Jeju Forum evaluated the challenges and opportunities the rise of China and the reunification of the Korean peninsula will offer. The Forum also took note of the great potential of new growth on the basis of the Asian entrepreneurship. With this background, various programs on Korea-China economic cooperation are prepared. The contents of new standard and its perspectives were reviewed. New growth potential, creative industry, new leadership, the future of education and the role of women were also addressed. Peace and common prosperity on the Korean peninsula and East Asia through the promotion of mutual understanding was discussed. The cultural exchanges and fusion in East Asia was reviewed and we evaluated how it is promoting the sense of community among the Asian peoples. Various issues of peace in East Asia such as the resolution of the North Korean nuclear problem, historical reconciliation and maritime security are among the topics. The recent natural disaster of Japan was reviewed and among the related topics are how to deal with the climate change and natural disasters.

Host: Jeju Special Self-Governing Province, International Peace Foundation, East Asia Foundation, JoongAng Ilbo

Organizer: Jeju Peace Institute

TIME	ORGANIZATION	SESSION	ROOM
14:00 ~ 15:10		[1-A] Responsibility to Protect in Asia and the Pacific 유엔과 보호책임	Crystal Hall A
Moderator CHOI, Jong-moo (Head United Nations Project Office on Governance) Panelists Boris KONDOCH (Director Asia Center for Peace & Security Studies)/(Editor-in-Chief of the Journal of International Peacekeeping) Discussants CHO, Chang Beom (Vice President United Nations Association of Republic of Korea) Christian BAUREDER (Protection Officer, United Nations High Commissioner for Refugees Korea) 사회 최종무(유엔 거버넌스센터 원장) 발표 보리스 콘도흐(아시아평화안보센터 소장) 토론 조창범(한국유엔협회 부회장) 크리스티안 바우레더(유엔난민고등판무관사무소 보호담당관 The traditional concept of state security involves the preservation of a country’s territories and the protection of its sovereignty. However, this conventional model no longer guarantees the security of the general populace in many countries. The UN has raised the issue of the Responsibility to Protect on the assumption that the individuals’ happiness and welfare should form the basis of security, rather than the traditional concept of security centered on the state, from the perspective of “security and peace for whom?” - What is the current status of the recently raised issue concerning the Responsibility to Protect? - Are countries fulfilling their Responsibility to Protect? - What should be the role of the civic community concerning the Responsibility to Protect? - What is the establishment of peace from the perspective of global governance? 국가 간의 영토보전과 주권수호를 의미하는 전통적인 국가안보(State Security)의 틀로는 개인이 보호되지 못하고 있습니다. 본 세션은 억압받는 자국민의 현실에 대한 국제사회의 문제의식에 의존하여 출발합니다. 유엔에서는‘누구의 안보, 누구의 평화인가?’라는 측면에서 국가중심의 전통적인 안보개념 대신 개인의 안녕과 복지가 안보의 준거가 되어야 한다는‘보호책임’(Responsibility to Protect)론을 제기합니다. - 최근 새로운 안보 이슈로 등장한‘보호책임’론의 현재 동향은 어떠한가? - 과연 오늘날 국가들은‘보호책임’을 다하고 있는가? - ‘보호책임’에 대한 시민사회의 역할은 무엇인가? - 글로벌 거버넌스 측면에서 본 평화구축이란 무엇인가?’

Speaker